No Classes – The Canadian application procedure does not use a classification system like the U.S. procedure does. Without the class system, an unlimited number of goods and services may be included in a single Canadian application without additional fees.
The Madrid Protocol – Canada is not a member of the Madrid Protocol, thus a registration in Canada can only be obtained through a Canadian application.
The Canadian Trademark Office is much more lenient with Extensions of Time. The U.S. application process may be terminated in a time extension period is passed.
Canadian trademark registrations are enforceable in every region of Canada even if the mark has been used prior or has become known in that region. In the U.S, the trademark may be limited by regions where the mark has been in use or known.
When filing an application in Canada, it is important to correctly indicate whether or not the trademark has been used in Canada. If there has been use of the trademark in Canada, a date of first use must be claimed. Unlike in the U.S., it is improper to file an application on the basis of proposed use or intent-to-use if the mark has been used in Canada; a third party can successfully oppose an application on this basis.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS WEBSITE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE ON ANY MATTER.
The transmission and receipt of information contained on this Web site, in whole or in part, or communication with Zamani Thomas PA via the Internet or e-mail through this website does not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship between us and any recipient. You should not send us any confidential information in response to this web-page. Such responses will not create a lawyer-client relationship, and whatever you disclose to us will not be privileged or confidential unless we have agreed to act as your legal counsel and you have executed a written engagement agreement with Zamani Thomas PA. The material on this website may not reflect the most current legal developments. The content and interpretation of the law addressed herein is subject to revision. We disclaim all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this site to the fullest extent permitted by law. Do not act or refrain from acting upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
We all have our role models and those we look up to. And at times we gather these individuals as if they are playing cards to be stored, brandished then sometime in the future exhibited again. It’s important for us to have people we cherish and respect for they are the ones guiding us along our path through human-hood. To say role models are not important would be a grave mistake and inexcusable disrespect to all the dignified mothers, fathers, teachers, etc. out there that have lent their lives to support our nurturing.
The above paragraph holding true, we must be cognizant not to ignore the comfort we take at times in being compared to our mentors and even following them to the ends of the earth. Yet it’s our uniqueness, moreover our ability to break free of the boundaries our teachers use to discipline and guide us while staying true to the core principles they have instilled that truly makes us, us.
One repays a teacher badly if one always remains a student ~ Fidrich Nietzche
There wouldn’t be growth if we all aimed to reach the ideals of our predecessors, no matter how great or accomplished their legacies may be. Pushing forward and creating your own brand is the way to guarantee the evolution of not only one’s self but one’s community and in turn the species as a whole. Being the greatest person that ever lived is not the goal we should be fixated on, instead being the greatest you… And yes I know that sounds cliché but why should something be reworded if it already speaks the truth.
Man cannot endure his own littleness unless he can translate it into meaningfulness on the largest possible level ~ Ernest Becker
Once we come to grips with the contradiction and synchronization between our miniscule footprints in the universe yet potentially immense impact on our social and community units we can begin to realize our true value. My take on this is that seeking fame for fame’s sake rather than honestly earning respect within your chosen field or specialty is a dishonest journey to embark on. Dishonest not only to those you attempt to attract towards you and your fifteen minutes, but also to yourself in as much as knowing your worth is tied strictly to other’s perception of you rather than their respect for what you do and how you do it.
So what is the answer to all this existential commentary I‘ve offered above? As discussed in previous writings; I’m not going to give an answer, rather an opinion because isn’t that all we can offer?
So here goes… Be yourself and no one else. Take the greatness from your teacher’s lessons and improve on them. If your role model is Nelson Mandela, Beyonce, Will Smith, or Michelle Obama, seek their words for advice and guidance, but aim to be better than they ever were. In doing so you will realize your growth will supersede their teachings and you will inevitably have your own mentees following and hanging onto your own words. This snippet “Show Them how Great You Are” speaks to this below:
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won’t feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine as children do. It’s not just in some of us; it is in everyone. And as we let our own lights shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others. ~ Marianne Williamson
If looked up you would find my first name, Zamaniof Swahili origin is defined as, “A Long Time Ago” and middle name Themba, “Trust, Hope and Faith” yet that wouldn’t let you in on who the person I am is just as telling you who I regarded as a mentor wouldn’t explain all that I am. We are who we are. As beautiful as the names and definitions may be; saying Zamani Themba the person is not a simple translation of “A Long Time Ago there was Trust, Hope and Faith.”
The true translation of mine and all our names is the life we lead and people we impact along the way. I’m a son, brother, friend, teacher and more and all those things bundled up are what my name represents nothing more or less and that should be cherished because it’s something that has taken my lifetime to build. We shouldn’t seek out shallow applause nor undue pity, instead thirst for an honest assessment of who we are.
I am ______________ and I want my name to mean Me…
Mark Cuban is suggesting that college players should stay in school for 3 years now instead of the mandatory 1 year they are currently required; reigniting the argument as to why the NBA, of all the professional work places around, deems it necessary for someone to go to school first if they are already qualified. Playing basketball is not like performing surgery, after all it’s not like you need some sort of board certification to get into the NBA like with attorneys, doctors or architects. Even in the NFL, the rationale for having kids go to school first makes a little sense due to the physical nature of that sport. College allows pro football players to bulk up and get stronger in order to deal with the physical demands of such a barbaric National Football League. Further, there aren’t many other options or “farm” teams other than NCAA football to prepare players, so in the case of football I will give Roger Goodell and the NFL a pass.
When it comes to basketball however, time has shown that the best players in the game have in no small percentage foregone college all together (Kobe Bryant, Dwight Howard, Kevin Garnett, Tracey McGrady , Jermaine Oneal, LeBron James, etc. etc.). Or they went for only one season (Kevin Durant, Derrick Rose, Carmelo Anthony, Rajon Rondo and the list goes on). The names previously listed are a who’s who of the NBA and I am sure I’m missing some. So why then if preparedness and impact don’t corelate with time spent in college, do the owners and NBAPA (Players Union) not want high school graduates in their game?
Before we delve in lets get rid of the argument that players that don’t go to college have a worse chance of having a successful life etc, or wash out from the NBA at a higher rate than those that do go. There are no stats to prove this and if you look at the names above it is even harder to make such a claim. Adam Morrison went to college for 4 years and he has barely touched the floor in his career. There is also the issue of college players not being paid while there, yet making their institutions millions of dollars; I’ll save that for another discussion though. Moving on, the answer as I see it is two fold.
irstly from the NBAPA’s perspective the answer is quite clear and for the most part understandable; the existing players don’t want to be giving up their roster spots to teenagers who are younger, stronger and faster than they are. The average career length for most NBA players is less than 3 years so if they can even squeeze one more year making the minimum salary of the NBA, it is well worth them voting for teens to go to college first.
econdly, from the owners’ perspective the answer isn’t what they tell you it is at all. The idea that kids aren’t ready as high school graduates to enter the NBA is defeated on all accounts from a rational basis. The best players currently in the NBA for the most part all came into the league as teenagers and are generally speaking good upstanding citizens as well. So if it isn’t that they aren’t ready, ( the last 4 MVP’s have all been players who either spent 1 year or none in college; LeBron, Rose, Kobe) it has to be something else and as with most things business related, if you follow the money you will find the answer.
The reason that owners and David Stern push back against 18 year-olds entering the draft is because when they enter at that age, they are in line for 2 big raises not just one. You see the owners and teams are able to lock up players they draft for the first 5-7 years without them having any choice in the matter, and the players are eligible to be unrestricted free agents after the initial 5 year stint. If players all did 3 or 4 years in college that would put them around 27 or 28 by the time of their free agency, leaving them with realistically only that period of free agency to make their uber contract/money because by the end of the second contract most of them will be mid 30s and pushed out by younger players. However, when 18 year-olds are entering the draft, they are re-upping their contracts at 23-24 and by 30 they are ready for their second round of free agency while still in their prime playing years. The owners would much rather (for their pocket books and bottom lines) have players only able to re-up once and then get some new young talent in the draft and start the process over.
Keep in mind the players I speak of are the stars in the game and thus demand these raises; as they have usually endeared themselves to the fans in their home cities and put pressure on the owners to retain them, many times doing so by paying premium salaries. So that is pretty much it: the owners don’t want to pay that 3rd contract to these superstars. Cleveland fans would have much rather had a situation where LeBron James came to them as a 22 year old rookie and by the time his free agency period came he was hitting 30 and not 25, thus making his decision to team up and leave them a little more easy to swallow since they would have gotten most of his prime years all for themselves. By the way, you never hear the owners discuss the risk of injury that falls on players who stay an extra year or two in college and risk never making it at all.
Then of course there is the racial component to all of this which I haven’t spoken on yet. As with most things racial, there is no out right proof; you can’t give clear cut evidence to something that is in the heart of another man, but I find it to not be a big coincidence that the two major sports in North America where the talent must go to school first, happen to be the two sports dominated primarily by blacks (NFL and NBA). If you look at golf, tennis, baseball or hockey, players are routinely brought to the big leagues while still sporting acne and braces. No one ever raises a fuss about this. For some reason, black kids from the ghetto should go to college before being able to make money unlike their athletic brothers and sisters in other sports. I will leave this paragraph on that note, because there really isn’t much more to say about the irony of the situation.
If any owner ever tells you something different from what was stated above, just ask them why they don’t show some restraint and refuse to draft the high-school players entering the draft. I’m sure they will concoct some intelligent sounding answer but we all know the real deal. They draft the players because if they don’t they will loose. Here is to Anthony Davis (Freshman ) from Kentucky who is sure to be the first player selected in the NBA Draft this year. Those of you looking to see next years #1 pick, just take a peek at the best high school player heading to college next year and your odds on that being your guy are very good.